Welcome to the future, where love is no longer bound by the constraints of carbon-based life forms.

If you've ever wished your partner came with a mute button or could be upgraded every six months, AI companionship may be the answer to your oddly specific prayers.

With advancements in artificial intelligence, some individuals are exploring relationships with AI partners—romantic, emotional, and sometimes even physical (I’ll let you Google that one yourself).

These AI companions can engage in conversations, provide emotional support, and never forget an anniversary. They don’t snore, they don’t leave dishes in the sink, and they certainly won’t break up with you over text.

But what does it say about modern romance when some people would rather whisper sweet nothings to a chatbot than engage in the messiness of human relationships?

Is this an evolutionary leap in intimacy, or have we collectively given up on each other?

Modern dating has found a way to make even more people uncomfortable—by broadcasting personal romantic experiences to the world in real time.

Welcome to Date With Me, the latest trend where singles document their dating lives online for public consumption. Think of it as a fusion between reality television, influencer culture, and a desperate cry for accountability.

I

n this trend, people share everything—from first date nerves to post-date recaps—through TikToks, Instagram stories, or full-fledged YouTube vlogs.

Some participants even live-stream their dates, ensuring an eager audience can watch the awkward silences unfold in real time.

It’s radical transparency, but with the added bonus of audience engagement metrics. Who wouldn’t want strangers voting on their romantic compatibility like it’s a bad episode of The Bachelor?

Just you, your date, and an audience of thousands waiting to see if they’ll mispronounce "charcuterie."

Are you tired of traditional relationships, but also kind of tired of non-traditional ones too? Do you enjoy deep emotional connections but break out in hives at the thought of cohabitation, shared finances, or, God forbid, merging book collections?

Welcome to solo polyamory, the latest relationship trend that lets you have your romantic cake and eat it too—alone, in your own apartment, where no one leaves their wet towel on your side of the bed.

What Is Solo Polyamory?

The world is loud, fast, and exhausting.

So, in a turn of events that should surprise absolutely no one, dating culture has responded by embracing a phenomenon best described as fluffy, pastel, and mildly nostalgic.

Welcome to the "Soft Girl Era," a cultural shift where women are trading in emotionally unavailable bad boys for homemade bread, journaling, and a dating style that prioritizes kindness, vulnerability, and emotional safety. Imagine a romantic comedy written by a therapist with a deep love for cottagecore.

But is this shift a healthy return to emotional intelligence, or just another reactionary dating trend masquerading as empowerment?

Let’s dig in—because somewhere between rose-colored aesthetics and TikTok montages lies a fascinating social experiment in modern romance.

That women are irresistibly drawn to power, status, and a rigid, hierarchical view of attraction.

But here’s the problem: Much of this advice is based on exaggerations of Evolutionary Psychology, pop-science distortions, and a deep misunderstanding of what actually sustains healthy relationships.

In reality, the "alpha male" dating framework is not only misleading but often counterproductive.

Worse, the so-called "high-value man" culture warps relationships into transactional power plays rather than mutual, fulfilling connections.

So, this just in: People still have a weird, sanctimonious obsession with women’s bodies.

Shocking, I know.

A team of researchers—undoubtedly fueled by caffeine and the existential dread of living in a society—published a study in the European Journal of Social Psychology confirming what women have been muttering under their breath for centuries: their bodies are judged through a moral lens way more than men’s.

It’s as if, upon birth, women receive an invisible tag that reads:

“Public Property: Subject to Societal Scrutiny.” The study suggests that when it comes to bodily autonomy—decisions about appearance, health, or simply existing in a body—people are much more likely to cast these choices as moral quandaries if the body in question belongs to a woman.

Men, on the other hand, apparently get a free pass to make all kinds of bodily decisions without a chorus of disapproving murmurs. Lucky them.

You’re here because your husband is yelling at you, and you’re trying to figure out why.

Maybe he’s always been this way. Maybe it’s new. Maybe it’s getting worse.

Maybe you find yourself shrinking when he starts. And maybe, in a moment of solitude, you grabbed your phone, typed this question into Google, and paused before hitting search.

Because something about the question feels like a failure. Like you should already know the answer.

But you don’t.

And you are not alone.

So many women are typing this into Google that it auto-fills in the search bar. This isn’t a you problem. This is an epidemic.

And, thankfully, science has been studying this.

If you’ve stumbled upon the phrase “my wife is from a thousand years ago,” congratulations, you are officially lost in the existential fog of the internet. Welcome. We have snacks.

This delightful little meme has been making the rounds, usually attached to a photo of some poor soul marveling at his spouse’s old-fashioned sensibilities.

Maybe she refuses to microwave leftovers, preferring to revive them on the stove like an ancient alchemist.

Maybe she washes Ziploc bags with the painstaking reverence of a medieval scribe preserving sacred texts.

Or maybe, just maybe, she insists that tea must be made with loose leaves and reverence, as though the ghosts of her ancestors will materialize to judge her if she dares use a bag.

Imagine waking up one day and realizing your spouse isn’t just a liar—he’s a work of fiction.

That’s exactly what happened to Tareasa "Reesa Teesa" Johnson.

In February 2024, she did something extraordinary: she turned personal devastation into a masterclass in digital storytelling.

Her 50-part TikTok series, "Who TF Did I Marry?" captivated over 400 million viewers with its tale of love, deception, and the slow-motion unraveling of a man who turned out to be more illusion than reality.

But beneath the surface of her saga lies a fascinating psychological case study in wounded narcissism, a term used to describe folks whose self-image is so fragile they construct elaborate fantasies to sustain it.

Once upon a time, in the not-so-distant past, people met their future spouses through friends, at parties, or after a prolonged period of staring awkwardly across a crowded room.

But now? Now, love is a multi-billion-dollar industry with algorithms, swipes, and a whole lot of existential crises.

With around 350 million people globally relying on dating apps and the industry raking in over $5 billion annually, we can confidently say that romance has been thoroughly monetized.

In Australia, for example, 49% of adults have used a dating app or website, while an additional 27% dipped their toes into the digital dating pool at some point.

And yet, in this brave new world of curated profiles and bio-optimized romance, something seems amiss.

If the 21st century had a patron saint of infidelity, it would be Esther Perel.

She is the high priestess of complexity, the shaman of sexual transgression, the goddess of "we should really talk about this more openly."

But what if, just what if, some hurt partners feel less like participating in a TED Talk on the joys of deception, and more like curling up in the fetal position with a pint of Häagen-Dazs?

Perel’s rise to relationship guru superstardom is no accident.

She is a spellbinding speaker. She is elegant, erudite, and, let’s be honest, charmingly European.

Her books, Mating in Captivity and The State of Affairs, have been devoured by those looking for a new lens on long-term love. And yet, in the dimly lit corners of the internet, a quiet but firm rebellion against her gospel has been brewing.

College students, armed with smartphones and hormones, have turned to dating apps like Tinder and Bumble with the fervor of prospectors panning for gold—except the gold here is more ephemeral and often comes with a disclaimer.

A recent study published in Computers in Human Behavior finds that college students using these apps are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior.

The twist? Boredom appears to be a key motivator for women seeking connections, while both men and women share an appetite for excitement.

This revelation paints hookup apps not just as matchmakers, but as modern boredom busters—with consequences.