The Happiness Curve Is Breaking: Why Young Adults Are Now the Most Miserable Generation
Friday, October 31, 2025
For decades, the science of happiness offered a tidy parable about aging: life satisfaction follows a U-shaped curve.
We begin bright-eyed and hopeful, sag into the doldrums of midlife, and climb back toward serenity as the years pile on.
It was a reassuring story — proof that time, at least psychologically, heals all things.
But the data no longer fit the story. Across continents, the curve has collapsed. The happiest people are not the young; they’re the old.
Why are the most miserable humans now the ones just starting out?
Two Lives, One Curve
In therapy, you begin to hear it.
Emma, 26, describes waking each morning with the dread of checking her phone — a flood of notifications, unpaid bills, and political headlines that feel like weather patterns over which she has no control.
She works two part-time jobs, can’t afford an apartment alone, and scrolls through other people’s “quiet luxury” lives before bed. “I feel,” she says, “like adulthood never arrived.”
Mark, 64, retired last year. He spends mornings volunteering at a local food pantry, afternoons walking his dog. “I don’t have the same drive I once did,” he says, “but I finally feel… balanced.”
Emma and Mark are on opposite sides of the old U-curve. But this new data suggest that curve has flipped.
The Vanishing U-Shape
In a 2025 cross-national study of 44 countries, researchers found that misery now peaks among the young, not the middle-aged (Bryson, Blanchflower, & Xu, 2025).
Among U.S. women aged 18–24, daily reports of poor mental health nearly tripled since the 1990s. For young men, they more than doubled. Older adults remained largely stable.
Economist David Blanchflower, who once championed the midlife slump, now calls this a “generational inversion” (Blanchflower, 2020). His collaboration with psychologist Jean Twenge revealed similar findings across six English-speaking countries: happiness has declined steeply among young adults while improving slightly among retirees (Twenge & Blanchflower, 2025).
Globally, the 2024 World Happiness Report finds that older adults consistently report higher life satisfaction than those under thirty (Helliwell et al., 2024).
In Japan, for example, hikikomori isolation has become a generational syndrome (Sakamoto & Watanabe, 2022). In South Korea, suicide rates among young adults remain among the world’s highest (Park & Kim, 2023). And in Brazil, adolescent anxiety is rising faster than income (Silva et al., 2022).
Why Are Young People So Profoundly Unhappy?
Digital Immersion.
The relationship between social media use and well-being is no longer speculative. Experiments show that reducing social-media time improves sleep, reduces loneliness, and slightly boosts happiness (Hunt et al., 2018; Allcott et al., 2020). But as Orben (2020) notes, it’s not the screen that’s toxic — it’s the endless social comparison.
Economic Precarity.
Paid work used to protect mental health; now it sometimes predicts despair. Young adults face historic levels of debt and housing insecurity (Bryson et al., 2025). Flexibility is a poor substitute for stability.
Social Disconnection.
Friendship networks are thinning. Loneliness rates among Gen Z are the highest ever recorded (Cigna, 2024). When human connection is replaced by engagement metrics, belonging becomes a luxury good.
Existential Fatigue.
Younger cohorts are navigating a world framed by climate anxiety, polarization, and news cycles that feel apocalyptic (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020). Hope itself has become an act of resistance.
How the Brain Explains the Shift
Neuroscientist Laura Carstensen’s socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al., 2011) helps clarify the paradox.
Older adults regulate emotion better because their time horizon narrows — they focus on meaning, not ambition.
Younger adults, are much more wired for exploration, comparison, novelty, and struggle when the environment offers only uncertainty.
In short: the emotional brain of a 25-year-old was built for expansion, not survival mode.
Rethinking “It Gets Better”
The old narrative — that happiness rebounds naturally with age — may have reflected a historical privilege, not a biological truth. For many young adults today, the scaffolding of stability has vanished. The result is not weakness, but adaptation: despair as realism.
Still, the data offer one source of optimism: happiness in later life remains possible, even probable. Older adults thrive when they stay socially engaged, purposeful, and kind. If policymakers and clinicians can deliver those same conditions earlier in the life course, there’s no reason the curve couldn’t rise again.
What We Can Do
Policy: Treat social connection like infrastructure — fund community spaces, affordable housing, and youth mental-health initiatives.
Therapy: Stop assuming youth equals resilience. Teach emotional regulation, reframing, and digital hygiene early.
Culture: Revalue presence over performance. The algorithm measures engagement; your nervous system measures safety.
FAQ
Why are young people less happy than previous generations?
A: Research points to a combination of economic insecurity, digital immersion, and social fragmentation. These forces amplify stress while eroding community — the strongest predictor of well-being across cultures (Holt-Lunstad, 2021).
Does happiness still rise with age?
A: In many countries, yes. Emotional regulation improves, priorities shift, and older adults report more gratitude and meaning (Carstensen et al., 2011). But this pattern is cultural, not universal; it depends on social stability and health.
Is social media the main cause?
A: No. It’s a multiplier, not a root. Controlled experiments show small-to-moderate effects, suggesting that tech stress compounds — but doesn’t create — underlying disconnection (Orben, 2020; Hunt et al., 2018).
Can we fix the curve?
A: Absolutely. Happiness responds to social policy, education, and environment. As the World Happiness Report puts it, “well-being is not a private trait but a public good” (Helliwell et al., 2024).
Final Thoughts
The data may say that happiness has migrated upward with age, but the story isn’t finished. The next cultural project — for therapists, policymakers, and families — is to make it possible for Emma to feel as balanced at 26 as Mark does at 64.
Because the happiness curve isn’t destiny. It’s policy, culture, and connection — drawn by the society we build, and redrawn by the courage to care.
Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed.
REFERENCES:
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(1), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903947117
Blanchflower, D. G. (2020). Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 575–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00797-z
Bryson, A., Blanchflower, D. G., & Xu, X. (2025). Lifetime trends in happiness change as misery peaks among the young. The Conversation.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (2011). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 66(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023002
Cigna. (2024). 2024 U.S. Loneliness Index Report. Cigna Healthcare.
Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., & De Neve, J.-E. (2024). World Happiness Report 2024. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Holt-Lunstad, J. (2021). The major health implications of social connection. Clinical Psychology Review, 88, 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102943
Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 60, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.07.002
Orben, A. (2020). The Sisyphean cycle of technology panics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(5), 1143–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620918709
Park, J. Y., & Kim, D. H. (2023). Youth suicide and societal pressure in South Korea: A review of contributing factors. Psychiatry Research, 326, 115183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115183
Sakamoto, N., & Watanabe, K. (2022). The rise of hikikomori: Social withdrawal and mental health in modern Japan. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(7), 1473–1484. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221078152
Silva, R. A., Cardoso, T., & Martins, R. (2022). Adolescent anxiety and depression in Brazil: Trends and risk factors. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 38(4), e00194520. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00194520
Twenge, J. M., & Blanchflower, D. G. (2025). Declining life satisfaction and happiness among young adults in six English-speaking countries. NBER Working Paper No. 33490. National Bureau of Economic Research.